Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Augmentation of Labour

Welcome to DSpace BU Repository

Welcome to the Bahria University DSpace digital repository. DSpace is a digital service that collects, preserves, and distributes digital material. Repositories are important tools for preserving an organization's legacy; they facilitate digital preservation and scholarly communication.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Umbreen Idrees
dc.contributor.author Sara Ali
dc.contributor.author Ayaz Ahmed
dc.contributor.author Sajjad Sabir
dc.contributor.author Ammarah Saeed
dc.date.accessioned 2018-06-04T07:09:21Z
dc.date.available 2018-06-04T07:09:21Z
dc.date.issued 2017-01-01
dc.identifier.issn 2220-7562
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6614
dc.description.abstract Objective:To compare the efficacy of titrated oral mis oprostol solution with intravenous oxytocin for augmentation of labour in term primigravidae in active phase of labour with inadequate uterine contractions. Methodology:This randomized control trial was conducted in the department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, over a period of six months from 14-April to 13-October, 2014. A total of 760 (two groups of 380 each) primigravidae, between age 20-39 years, who had completed 37-42 gestational weeks by dates, or by ultrasound scan, with regular contractions and an effaced cervix dilated between 3-4 cm, and who later developed inadequate uterine contractions during the first stage of labour were included in the study. Group A received titrated oral misoprostol solution 200μg tablet dissolved in 200ml tap water and 20ml (20μg/hour) and group-B was given Intravenous oxytocin (10 units in 1000cc Hartman’s solution at 8 drops/minute, doubling every 30 minutes up to a maximum of 64 drops/min for 2 hours). Results: Mean (±SD) age of the patients was 26.4±4.4 and 26.6±4.6 years in group-A and B respectively. In group-A, 322 patients (84.7%) and in group-B 326 patients (85.8%) were delivered vaginally. Mean (±SD) augmentation to delivery interval was 293.82±99.36 and 311.65±106.73 minutes in group-A and B respectively. Mean (±SD) gestational age in group-A was 38.82±1.32 and in group-B 38.83±1.09 week. Caesarean section was performed in rest of the patients in both groups. There was no significant association between mode of delivery in both groups (P-value= 0.682). Conclusion:Labour augmentation with titrated oral misoprostol or intravenous oxytocin resulted in about similar rates of vaginal delivery en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College Karachi en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 7;1
dc.subject Augmentation of labour, Titrated oral Misoprostol, Intravenous oxytocin en_US
dc.title Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Augmentation of Labour en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account