Responsiveness Of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) And Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) In Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Undergoing Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery Versus Women With No Surgery

Welcome to DSpace BU Repository

Welcome to the Bahria University DSpace digital repository. DSpace is a digital service that collects, preserves, and distributes digital material. Repositories are important tools for preserving an organization's legacy; they facilitate digital preservation and scholarly communication.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Naila Mehboob
dc.contributor.author Asma Rauf
dc.contributor.author Ghana Shahid
dc.contributor.author Tehreem Sultana
dc.contributor.author Ghazala Mahmud
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-16T08:06:07Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-16T08:06:07Z
dc.date.issued 2018-01-01
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6393
dc.description.abstract Objective: To determine the responsiveness of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women with pelvic organ prolapse, undergoing vaginal reconstructive surgery versus women with no surgery. Methodology: This study was a cross sectional comparative study carried out in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pakistan Air Force Hospital, Mianwali in a period from January 2011 to December 2015. Prolapsed women with stage II or more and with willingness for surgery were included in the surgery group. Those willing for conservative management (pelvic floor exercises) were included in the non-surgical group. All patients in both groups completed the PFDI and PFIQ at baseline and 6 month follow-up. Results: Mean (±SD) age, weight, and parity of the patients were 51.42 (±9.07) years, 58.60 (±6.8) kg and 4.00 (±2.14) respectively. More than half of the patients (61%) belonged to low socio economic status, followed by middle class 34% and upper class 5%. Majority of the patients (61%) were post-menopausal. Most of the patients (72%) had stage II prolapse, followed by stage III (27%) and stage IV (1%). Among the associated symptoms, voiding dysfunction (81%) was most commonly observed symptom. At baseline all the scores were found to be significantly high in surgical group as compared to non-surgical group however at follow-up significantly low scores were observed in surgical group than non-surgical group. Also, significant decrease in mean scores was observed in both the groups from baseline to follow-up. Conclusion: The PFDI and PFIQ both are responsive to change in women undergoing surgical and non-surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. But PFDI and PFIQ are more responsive to change in the surgical group. It was also concluded that PFDI is more responsive than the PFIQ in women with pelvic organ relapse en_US
dc.description.sponsorship JBUMDC en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College Karachi en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 8;1
dc.subject Prolapse, PFDI, PFIQ, POPIQ, UDI, CRADI, POPDI, UIQ, CRAIQ en_US
dc.title Responsiveness Of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) And Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) In Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Undergoing Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery Versus Women With No Surgery en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account