Abstract:
Efficient financial management requires the existence of some objective or goal because
judgment as to whether or not a financial decision is efficient must be made in light of some
standard. Various objectives are possible of which the primary goal of the firm is to maximize
the wealth of the firm’s present owners. This study sought to find out the effect of operating
leverage on firm’s performance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship
between operating leverage, firm profitability and stock return. Industry Capital Structure
norms and the performance of companies in the Industry. Secondary data was collected from
the KSE. All sectors of the KSE are involved in the study with exception of the financial and
investment sector whose leverage is subject to regulation. The sample period was five years
between 2004 and 2008. The findings of the study were commercial and services sector had
the highest figures for leverage ratio, market value to book value and price earning ratio.
Among the companies involved in the study. We use a set of data on all Thai films to examine
whether firm size affects the relationship between financial leverage and operating
performance during the global financial crisis of 2004-2008. From a data set of 496,430 firm-
year observations of a sample of 170,013 firms during 2004-2008, we find that after
controlling for firm characteristics, GDP growth, and interest rates, the relation between
leverage and operating performance exists across the range of firm sizes, but the magnitude of
the effect is conditional on firm size. We show that the effect of leverage on operating
performance is non-monotonic, and that leverage change is associated with changes in
operating performance. Past operating performance is strongly related to leverage change for
medium-sized films, but this relationship does not exist among very small and very large
firms. Conditional on leverage and operating performance in 2007, leverage change during
2007-2008 has a negative effect on the change in operating performance over the same
period. Firms adopting Industry leverage had low leverage ratio, similar to that of the
industry, higher MV/BV and a higher PER as compared to the rest of the firms. This leads to
the rejection of the null hypothesis that conformist firms do not record higher performance
than non-conformist firms and acceptance of the alternative hypothesis. Further, in carrying
out regressions tests and Analysis of Variance tests (ANOVA) it was found out that there was a significant difference in leverage for different Industries. Commercial and services sector
had the highest financial leverage followed by Industrial and Allied sector and finally
Agricultural sector. This is a manifestation of capital structure theories that different firms
have different optimal capital structures depending upon firm characteristics.