| dc.description.abstract |
The study in the research project concerns operational inefficiencies within Ikonic solutions, a 120 employee IT services company which deals with 20-30 ongoing software development projects. The measures of current performance indicate the current rates of rework of 47.1% are higher than the industry standards of 12-18%, 51-75% delivery on-time as opposed to 85-90% and 23 percent daily wastage, translating to about 200,000 annual costs amounting to 13.3 percent of organizational revenue. The research involves a mixed-method design that employs a survey of 17 senior executives (an 85 percent response rate), and which is complemented by a document analysis and process observation. Several analytic frameworks revealed three problem areas (that are linked together): failure to communicate and coordinate (52.9% of delays), overuse of manual processes (82.3% of workflows have over 30% of manual work), and quality (70.6% of projects fail to have 25%+ of rework rates). Root cause analysis did establish that the technical capability limitations did not cause performance gaps but organizational structure and process deficiencies as rapid growth of 30 to 120 employees failed to keep pace with process development. The diagnostic stage was based on an integrated analytic model that uses Ishikawa diagrams, 5-Why analysis, and Pareto analysis to categorically identify the root causes in six dimensions people, processes, technology, measurement, communication, and organizational structure. It was found that the lack of alignment between sales and development teams, a lack of formal handoff procedures, a divided technological infrastructure on multiple platforms that are unrelated to each other (CRM, Asana, Slack, Excel), and insufficient performance measurement systems are the contributing factors to the inefficiencies in operations. Quantification of financial impact shows that sales-to-development handoff failures are costly only by themselves with an annual cost of 14,400 dollars, productivity losses caused by manual processes and coordination delays cost 74,400 dollars yearly, and client dissatisfaction and the risk of churn is an extra 95,600 dollars on an annual basis. The research suggests a three-step business process reengineering project based on the principles of BPR by Hammer and Champy (1993) and eight-step change management model by Kotter (1996), which uses ClickUp as a single operations platform. Phase One (Months 1-3, $1,200) installs formal sales-to-development hand off procedures, real-time project tracking, communications structure, and quality assurance gateways. The second Phase (Months 3-6, $4,600) is the display of unified dashboards and AI-based predictive project management analytics. Third phase (Months 6-12, $3,200) facilitates strategic change by integrating the entire platform, distributing resources using machine learning, and developing a rich business intelligence engine. Phase One will show 60-70% completion after 1.5 months, 67% of active users adopted and 15 of 25 projects moved to new platform successfully and three pilot projects with handoff completeness scores of 88-92%. The anticipated results are that the on-time delivery will have increased to 60-70% by Phase One completion and increased to 70-80% by Year One completion. Phase One will see rework rates to go down by 47.1 per cent to 30-35 per cent, which will ultimately reduce to 18-20 per cent with full implementation. The loss in productivity will reduce to 18-20% at the start with the long-term goals being 14-16%. Financial analysis assumes a cumulative saving of $171,141 in Year One compared to total investment of 9,000, expecting a better ROI in the start weeks of Phase One of implementation. The study adds to BPR literature as it shows how process-first, technology-enabled change can be implemented in mid-sized IT services organizations with a specific focus on change management practices that can lead to rapid user adoption and operational changes that can be measured within a short period of time. |
en_US |