Abstract:
Liquidity risk is a critical concern for both conventional and Islamic banks, but the nature and
management of this risk diffei significantly between the two banking systems due to their distinct
opeiational piinciples. Conventional banks primarily operate on a fractional reserve basis and are highly
dependent on interest-based financial products, which can make liquidity management more vulnerable
to market fluctuations and interest rate changes. They typically utilize a variety
interbank borrowing, central bank facilities, and short-term securities to manage liquidity risk.
However, during periods of financial instability or interest rate volatility, conventional banks may
experience challenges in maintaining sufficient liquidity.
of instruments such as
In contrast, Islamic banks operate under the principles of Shariah law, which prohibits interest (riba)
and mandates that financial transactions must be backed by real assets or services. This prohibition
restricts Islamic banks' ability to use traditional interest-bearing financial instruments for liquidity
management. Instead, Islamic banks rely on Shariah-compliant instruments such as profit-sharing
contracts (e.g., Mudarabah, Musharakah) and asset-backed securities (e.g., Sukuk) to maintain liquidity.
While these instruments align with the ethical principles of Islamic finance, they may also limit the
bank’s ability to respond quickly to sudden liquidity shortfalls. Additionally, Islamic banks face unique
liquidity risks due to the lack of a well-established market for Shariah-compliant liquidity instruments.
The difference in liquidity risk between conventional and Islamic banks also stems from the regulatory
and market environments in which they operate. Conventional banks are typically subject to global
liquidity requirements such as the Basel III framework, whereas Islamic banks may face additional
challenges in creating and implementing a robust liquidity management framework that adheres to both
regulatory standards and Islamic finance principles.
While both banking systems are exposed to liquidity risk, Islamic banks encounter unique challenges
due to their asset-backed nature and the restrictions imposed by Shariah law, making their liquidity
management strategies distinct from those of conventional banks
