| dc.description.abstract |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing global health challenge,
imposing significant disease burden and economic strain. In Pakistan, the situation
is particularly alarming. According to the most recent IDF Atlas (2025),
approximately 34.5 million adults (aged 20–79 years) are affected in Pakistan, with
an age-standardized prevalence of 31.4%, the highest in the world. This escalating
prevalence underscores the urgent need for effective treatment strategies tailored to
the local population. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the
clinical efficacy and safety profiles of initial double and triple combination
regimens in treatment-naïve patients with T2DM. After obtaining approval from
the Institutional Review Board of Bahria University Health Sciences, Karachi (IRB-
BUHSCK), this open-labeled, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial was conducted
at the Diabetic Clinic of the National Medical Center, Karachi. A total of 172
diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients (males and females, aged 30–55 years) meeting
inclusion criteria were enrolled through randomization via the sealed-envelope
method. Participants were allocated into four parallel treatment arms 43 in each:
Group A received Metformin 500 mg + Glimepiride 2 mg (fixed-dose combination,
FDC); Group B received Metformin 500 mg + Empagliflozin 12.5 mg (FDC);
Group C received Metformin 500 mg + Sitagliptin 50 mg (FDC); and Group D
received Metformin 500 mg + Empagliflozin 12.5 mg (FDC) + Sitagliptin 50 mg
once daily, in addition to lifestyle modifications. 150 patients successfully
completed the study (Group A: 34; Group B: 38; Group C: 37; Group D: 41). Of 90
days, with assessments at baseline, day 45, and day 90. The primary endpoint was
a reduction in HbA1c of at least ≥1% from baseline to day 90, while secondary
outcomes included changes in fasting and random blood sugar, body weight, and
lipid profile. Safety outcomes were evaluated through hematological, hepatic, renal,
and cardiovascular profiles, while adverse effects were also monitored. Results
demonstrated that all four groups achieved statistically significant glycemic
improvement (p < 0.001). The greatest HbA1c reduction was observed in Group D
(–1.57%), followed by Group A (–1.34%), Group B (–1.11%), and Group C (–
1.00%). Participants maintained self-monitoring weekly diaries, and assessments
was done on week 6 and 12. It was hypothesized that initial triple therapy would
viii
achieve superior glycemic reduction and metabolic benefits compared with double-
drug combinations. The triple combination (Group D: metformin + empagliflozin
+ sitagliptin) provided the most comprehensive benefits, improving
anthropometric, glycemic, lipid, hepatic, and renal parameters. Among the dual
regimens, Group A (metformin + glimepiride) achieved superior glycemic control
with modest lipid improvements, while Group B (metformin + empagliflozin) was
more effective for weight and triglyceride reduction with favorable effects on HDL
and renal function. Group C (metformin + sitagliptin) showed the least efficacy but
remained well tolerated. Overall, treatment effects followed: Group D > Group A
≈ Group B > Group C, confirming triple therapy as the most balanced strategy while
dual therapies offer targeted benefits that can be individualized |
en_US |