DSpace Repository

Comparative Assessment of Drinking Water Quality and Community Perception in Lower Dir, Pakistan

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sakina Bahr, 01-262232-009
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-05T06:11:15Z
dc.date.available 2025-12-05T06:11:15Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/20084
dc.description Supervised by Dr. Humera Farah en_US
dc.description.abstract The study examined bore wells, open wells, tube wells, and spring water quality in Kityari and Baghkandi villages, of Lower Dir, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. This study combined community perspective with biological, chemical, physical, and heavy metal investigation of drinking water sources to fill the gap in localized water quality research. Multiparameter tester, turbidity meter, titration, colorimetric technique, UV Spectrophotometer, ASS, and plate count method was used to examine 110 drinking water samples. Water quality was compared to Pak EPA and WHO drinking water standards. Kityari's bore, open, and tube well water analysis exceeded salt limits (318, 298, and 239 mg/L). Baghkandi bore well samples had acidic pH (6.40) and high salt levels (213 mg/L). Open wells had high salt levels (295 mg/L), and acidic pH (6.33). Tube wells had acidic pH (6.09) and high salts (230.5). Baghkandi's bore wells, open wells and tube wells all exhibited elevated levels of F- (4.07, 3.5 and 3.05 mg/L). Springs also had high F- (3.3 mg/L). Local geology can dissolve fluoride-rich minerals into groundwater from water sources, causing high F levels. Analysis of heavy metals revealed that Fe (1.77, 1.11 mg/L), Cd (0.06, 0.01mg/L), Ni (0.12, 0.41mg/L), Pb (0.54, 0.73mg/L), and Zn (7.92, 4.88mg/L) exceeded the permissible limits across all water source samples. All water sources had total coliforms and bacteria. Hazard Quotient (HQ) > 1 for Cd, Pb, and Zn (adults) and children in Kityari. Adults and children in Baghkandi had HQ > 1 for Pb, Ni, Cd, Zn, and Pb. Zn and Fe had the highest CDI. The ILCR showed Ni and Cd were substantial concerns in both villages. Kityari respondents were somewhat satisfied with their water quality, but Baghkandi respondents were not. Baghkandi had dental fluorosis, renal, and digestive disorders, whereas Kityari had some digestive challenges. Septic tanks, waste disposal sites and agricultural runoff present potential water pollution concerns. The study concluded that only properly treated water can be drinkable. Boiling, sand or activated carbon filtration, UV/RO treatment, chlorination, and regular water quality monitoring are recommended. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria University Engineering School Islamabad en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries MS(ES);T-3109
dc.subject Environmental Sciences en_US
dc.subject Analysis of Physical Parameters en_US
dc.subject Reagents and Materials en_US
dc.title Comparative Assessment of Drinking Water Quality and Community Perception in Lower Dir, Pakistan en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account