Abstract:
Placenta accreta is a severe maternal complication where the placenta abnormally attaches to
the uterine wall, causing signicant maternal and neonatal morbidity. Objectives: To compare
the effectiveness of Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the early detection
of placenta accreta and their impact on maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods: Using purposive
sampling, 150 high-risk pregnant women were screened with Colour Doppler Ultrasonography
and magnetic resonance imaging. Findings were conrmed at delivery. Maternal outcomes
included blood transfusion, emergency hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, and
hospital stay. Fetal outcomes included preterm birth, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive
care unit, admission. Sensitivity, specicity, positive, and negative predictive values were
calculated. Mc-Nemar's test compared modalities. Results: Of 150 patients, 74 had placenta
accreta. Colour-Doppler ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 86.5% and specicity of 89.1%,
diagnosing 64 cases. Magnetic resonance imaging showed 79.7% sensitivity and 83.3%
specicity, identifying 59 cases. Colour-Doppler ultrasonography was linked to fewer
emergency hysterectomies (p=0.032) and shorter intensive care unit stays (p=0.045). Preterm
birth (p=0.028) and low birth weight (p=0.037) were higher in placenta accreta cases diagnosed
with antepartum, though neonatal intensive care unit, admissions did not differ (p=0.451).
Magnetic resonance imaging helped in inconclusive Colour-Doppler ultrasonography cases.
Conclusions: It was concluded that Colour-Doppler ultrasonography is more effective than
magnetic resonance imaging for early Placenta accreta detection, offering better diagnostic
accuracy and improved outcomes. The ndings highlight its value in the clinical management of
high-risk pregnancies.